Talk before you procure
AFRC Lab › Builders & developers
Builder & developer · FHK+ed™

Prove the façade before you procure.

Independent pre-procurement compliance proof on the specified window and façade systems, then an on-site audit of what’s actually supplied. Price the package with certainty, and keep non-compliance a redline — not a variation after it’s built.

NCC Section J / F8 / H4 · pre-procurement proof · on-site audit · usually under $5k

The envelope risk lands on the build, not the supplier.

When the windows don’t perform, it’s the builder and developer wearing the callback, the rectification and the dispute. FHK+ed moves that risk to the front — proven before you commit, not discovered after handover.

Proven

An independent compliance report

Every specified system proven for Section J and F/H — independently, before you lock the package. Not the supplier’s own number.

Checked both ways

Spec vs what’s supplied

Modelled at specification, then audited on site against what actually turns up — so the installed job matches what was proven.

Priced right

Certainty before tender closes

Know the compliant package before the price is locked — and kill the late-stage value-engineering churn that erodes margin.

A redline

Not a variation

Catch non-compliance while it’s still a redline on a drawing — free to fix — instead of a variation, a delay or a dispute after it’s built.

What lands on your desk.

One register for the whole package: every specified system proven for Section J and condensation, and flagged the moment a substitution doesn’t stack up — while it’s still a redline.

Pre-procurement compliance registerFHK+ed™ · NCC Section J / F8 / H4PRJ-•••• · redacted
⚠ 4 OF 5 PROVEN · 1 TO RE-PROVEFour systems proven compliant; one substituted at tender needs re-proving before you procure. A redline now, not a variation later.
Specified systemSection JCondensationStatus
W1 — fixed light100-series, as specifiedPassPass✓ Compliant
W2 — sliding dooras specifiedPassPass✓ Compliant
W3 — awningas specifiedPassMarginal⚠ Re-check glass
CW-1 — curtain wallas specifiedPassPass✓ Compliant
D1 — entry doorsubstituted at tenderRe-prove—⚠ Substitution
Modelled at spec, then audited against what’s actually supplied on site — audit-ready both ways.

Illustrative register, client details redacted. Every FHK+ed engagement returns this — per system, proven to ISO 15099 by an engine validated against THERM. Final NCC compliance is determined by your assessor / certifier.

How it works

Front-load the compliance so the envelope is a known quantity, not a late surprise — usually under $5k.

Send the specified systems

The windows, doors and façade in the spec or tender — whatever’s been proposed for the project.

Spec in

We prove compliance

Independent modelling to ISO 15099 — Section J energy and condensation / Mould Index — on the actual systems, by an engine validated against THERM (222 results, 98.7% accuracy).

Independent

Procure with certainty

A compliant package you can price and lock, before the tender closes — with the evidence to back the spec.

Priced

On-site audit

We check what’s actually supplied against what was proven — audit-ready both ways, so the installed job holds up.

On site

Non-compliance stays a redline, not a variation.

The specified window is routinely swapped at tender or fabrication, and a rating on a catalogue product doesn’t follow the substitution. By the time it shows up — a failed certifier check, condensation in the first winter — it’s a variation, a delay, or worse. FHK+ed proves the real systems up front and audits what’s supplied, so the gap is caught while it’s still cheap to close. Independent proof, so it’s your evidence, not the supplier’s word.

“Having been ‘in the trenches’ with Dave from AFRC Lab, collaborating on analyses for a builder on a tight timeline, I have no hesitation in recommending his work. His output is timely, concise and accurate.”
— Builder · tight-timeline project
See it live

A window that passes in one zone can fail in another.

This interactive study shows exactly that — eight sill systems on the same glass, across climate zones 2, 5 and 6, with the Mould Index read against the NCC limit. It’s why the compliant package has to be proven on your systems, in your zones, before you procure — not assumed from a rating.

Interactive · TIRS™ · VCA Window Alliance

Which window keeps the mould out?

Eight fixed-sill systems, one glass, three climate zones — modelled for Mould Index, minimum surface temperature and holistic comfort. Pick a zone, compare any two, and see which pass and which don’t.

8systems
3climate zones
1shared glass
MI ≤ 3.0NCC gate
Open the interactive case study →

See all case studies →

Talk to us before you procure.

Send the specified systems and we’ll prove the envelope before the package is locked — independent, audit-ready, usually under $5k.

Talk before you procureSupplying the windows? →

Independent third party. AFRC Lab provides verification data, method and training — we don’t supply, sell or endorse products. Project-specific thermal simulation to ISO 15099 / NFRC 100; modelled results reflect the systems and sizes provided, and final NCC compliance is determined by your assessor / certifier. FHK+ed™ and TIRS™ are trademarks of AFRC Lab Pty Ltd.